HOA Law Blog

By Sandra L. Gottlieb, Esq., Senior Partner, Swedelson & Gottlieb

On July 11, 2011, the City of Pasadena passed a “no-smoking” ordinance for multi-family homes, defined as two or more units, applicable to both those now existing and to be built, effective January 1, 2012. The ordinance provides that it will be unlawful to smoke in any common area (broadly defined in the statute to include all areas other than a unit), patio, balcony or inside a unit within any multi-family building, and yes, this applies to condominiums.

As of January 1, 2012, owners and/or their community managers must post “No Smoking” signs, in capital letters, not less than one inch in height, on a contrasting background or, as an alternative, the association may post the international “no smoking” symbol instead of the written words, in the common areas of the association’s building(s) at first floor entrances and exits, lobbies, restrooms and elevators. The international “no smoking” symbol consists of a picture of a burning cigarette enclosed in a red circle with a red bar across it:

Further, effective January 1, 2012, all leases, rental agreements and purchase agreements (new or renewed, and this will apply to condominium associations and planned developments) must refer to the prohibition language in the ordinance and must provide a copy of the ordinance to the person or entity with whom they are contracting.

The actual enforcement of this ordinance will commence on July 1, 2013 and prohibit smokers from not only smoking on association common areas, but also within their condominium, which includes townhomes and, as it applies to non-association properties as well, rental and owned apartments. The ordinance will be enforced by the City, not by the associations.

If you are selling a home (unit condominium, townhome, etc.), you must include a reference to the “no smoking” ordinance in your purchase agreement, as well as include a copy of the ordinance. (Ordinance Section 8.78.080 Posting of Signs, and Section 8.78.085 Reduction of Drifting Tobacco Smoke in Multi-Unit Housing). Follow this link to view these ordinances.

As a final comment, the last sentence of the ordinance provides that “an owner, operator, manager, landlord, homeowners’ association or other person having control of a multi-unit housing unit shall post signs as required by Section 8.78.080; however, said persons may, but are not hereby required, to assist with enforcing the provisions of this section and shall not be deemed in violation of this section by failure to assist in its enforcement.” Fortunately, this clarifies that the City is not expecting homeowners associations to enforce the ordinance. It is imperative that Boards of Directors understand the extent and limits of their associations' obligations and not take on the enforcement obligations of the City.

Sandra Gottlieb can be contacted at slg@sghoalaw.com.

By David C. Swedelson and Sandra L. Gottlieb, California Condo Lawyers and HOA Attorneys

It's fall, and that means that most community association board members and management are busy finalizing their budgets (this applies to most community associations that have a calendar fiscal year). Unlike the old days, the budget is not all that California community associations need to be concerned about. What about all those disclosures that are required annually? Are you sure that your association is in compliance? Never fear, Swedelson & Gottlieb is here with our updated annual disclosure checklist. Follow this link for a PDF copy of our checklist which we provide annually, setting out all of the statutory disclosures that California community associations are required to provide to the owners/members.

Continue reading "It's November. What Are You Doing About Year-End Disclosures?" »

By Joan E. Lewis-Heard, Esq., Attorney, SwedelsonGottlieb

Edited by David C. Swedelson, Esq.

Many California condominium associations have common area storage lockers, rooms or areas that are made available to the owners. Sometimes, the storage area is assigned in a deed as exclusive use common area. More often than not, these areas are not assigned, and the board has the ability to assign and rent them to owners. And boards and the association’s management often have no idea of the issues that storage areas can create until they are smack dab in the middle of a dispute with an owner.

There are many commercial self-service storage facilities that serve the general public; one of the more popular ones is called “Public Storage”. Although homeowner associations that rent storage spaces to their owners generally do so on a much smaller scale, when an association does rent out these areas to owners, it is considered to be a “self-service storage facility” as defined under the California Self-Service Storage Facility Act.

To read more, follow this link.

Blog Posting by David C. Swedelson, Senior Partner, SwedelsonGottlieb.

I just read an excellent article by Robert M. Nordlund, P.E., R.S.
 with Association Reserves, Inc. that addresses the issue of how much California condominium associations should be reserving. He starts out with the proposition that “[t]ypically (that is a dangerous word), most condominium associations should be setting aside 15% - 40% of their assessments towards Reserves. This ratio is lower for associations where each homeowner maintains their own home and the association is only responsible for some minimal common areas. Obviously, every association has its own unique list of common area assets it is responsible to maintain. Some may have a longer list that force higher Reserve contributions (pool, elevator, tennis court, balconies, wood siding, etc.), some may have shorter lists of amenities or more cost-efficient exterior finishes.”

Nordlund does go on to say that in addition to these physical factors, there are three other important influences to your reserve contributions: 1. Economic assumptions for interest and inflation; 2. Your current “starting point”, measured in terms of “Percent Funded”; and 3.Your Objective, full funding or baseline funding?

So what is the bottom line for your association? Don’t know? Don’t understand these terms? Then you need to read the entire article. Follow this link.

And if you have “legal” questions regarding reserves, contact David Swedelson via email: dcs@sghoalaw.com.

Prepared By David C. Swedelson.

We are amazed by the number of board members and managers that do not know that there is a Vehicle Code Section (§22658) that addresses how and when California condominium and planned development community associations can tow vehicles that are not legally parked. Compliance with the Vehicle Code is required, and non-compliance could subject the Association to potential fines, legal liability and damages.

On January 1, 2007, changes and amendments to the provisions to California Vehicle Code §22658, relating to towing from private property, including common interest developments, went into effect. No longer can an association instruct security services or a towing service to tow vehicles that may not be authorized. Rather, the association must comply with the new stringent laws.

Continue reading "Do You Tow Vehicles At Your Association(s)? Are You Complying With the Vehicle Code?" »

Calemine v. Jared Court Homeowners Association, Inc.

In an unpublished opinion, the California Court of Appeals, relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Lamden, upheld a trial court ruling that a condominium association, acting in good faith and in the best interests of the community, can decide not to take action to stop water from intruding or leaking into a unit due to construction defects in common areas.

Jared Court, an 18 unit townhouse style condominium association located in Woodland Hills, California, is made up of four buildings and common area that includes a tennis court, swimming pool, concrete walkways, front patios and mature landscaping. The CC&Rs require that the Association "maintain the portion of the project not occupied by the units [the common area], in good, clean, attractive and sanitary order and repair."

Continue reading "Association Does Not Have to Stop Water Intrusion Into Condominium Units" »

The Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) recently celebrated its twenty (20) year anniversary. The ADA has had a significant impact on all of us by knocking down architectural construction barriers that had previously prevented people with disabilities from being able to access public facilities, for example by making sure that business entrances are wheelchair accessible, requiring that store aisles be widened, and mandating other modifications that provide people with disabilities the ability to access public buildings and public recreational facilities. However, despite what some homeowners will want their associations to believe, the ADA does not generally apply to California community associations. The purpose of the ADA has always been to provide people with disabilities access to public places, and community associations are, for the most part, private and not public.

In the winter of 2009, the Greater Los Angeles Chapter of Community Associations Institute published an article written by firm attorneys David C. Swedelson and Stephanie M. Rohde entitled “Does the Americans With Disabilities Act (“ADA”) Apply to Your Association? Probably Not!” Follow this link to read or download a copy of their article. And if you have any questions regarding whether the ADA applies to your California community association, please do not hesitate to contact David C. Swedelson, Esq., at dcs@sghoalaw.com or Stephanie M. Rohde, Esq., at smr@sghoalaw.com.

Don’t you wish that you could utilize e-mail or other new technology to disseminate important association documents? Maybe you can! Effective January 2010, Civil Code Section 1350.7 was amended to allow community associations to send certain documents to the owners via e-mail or other methods of electronic delivery. Our Senior Partner, Sandra Gottlieb, has prepared an article regarding electronic delivery and the amendment to Civil Code Section 1350.7. This article was published in the March/April 2010 edition of the O.C. View, the bi-monthly publication of the Orange County Chapter of the Community Associations Institute. Follow this link to read this important article.

It is October, and many association boards of directors and managers are in the process of preparing their associations' 2010 budgets and statutory disclosure mailings. As we have done every year for the last decade, we have posted Swedelson & Gottlieb’s Annual Disclosure and Notice Checklist to assist you with that process. Even if you have already sent out your budget and disclosure package, you may want to review the checklist to make sure that you have not forgotten anything. Note that there are a few changes to statutes. For example, the Notice of Assessments, Foreclosures and Payment Plans pursuant to Civil Code Section 1365.1 has been modified. In addition, there are some new changes effective January 1, 2010 regarding the Assessment in Reserve Funding Disclosure Summary, the creation of a Disclosure Document Index, and other procedural changes. Please check our blog later this week for a summary of those new laws and their application to your associations.

Effective January 1, 2005, Assembly Bill 1836 changes the current requirements and process for Alternative Dispute Resolution,  by amending the existing provisions of the Davis-Stirling Common Interest Development Act (“Act) and adding additional provisions to the Act.  This Bill was introduced to enact recommendations made by the California Law Review Commission (CLRC). This new legislation requires that associations adopt some form of Internal Dispute Resolution process, as discussed below, and it also expands the scope of the disputes to which the Alternative Dispute Resolution processes must or can be applied within community associations.

Existing law requires that certain disputes be submitted to Alternative Dispute Resolution prior to a lawsuit being filed, either by a homeowner or by the association.  This Bill establishes a two-tier process to address disputes prior to enforcement through the court system.  As of 2005, associations are required to implement an informal process by which homeowners and boards "meet and confer" to discuss their disputes.  The CLRC came to the conclusion that some association boards were not talking with homeowners regarding their disputes, and felt that by encouraging personal communication that many disputes would be resolved without court intervention.

If the dispute is not resolved through the informal “meet and confer” process, either the owner/member or the association must still submit the dispute to some form of formal Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) prior to filing a lawsuit in the Superior Court.

Assembly Bill 1836 amends Section 1354 of the Davis-Stirling Act to clarify that all governing documents, which include rules and regulations, Articles, Bylaws, as well as CC&Rs, may be enforced by any owner of a separate interest or by the association, or both.  This change reinforces the concept  recognized by the California Court of appeals in Beehan v Lido Isle Community Association that not all association disputes have to be enforced or resolved by the association.

As was the case prior to enactment of Assembly Bill 1836, neither associations nor homeowners are obligated to use the mandatory “meet and confer” and the ADR process for disputes involving a claim for monetary damages in excess of $5,000.00, Small Claims actions, or, except as provided in the Davis-Stirling Act, to assessment disputes.

This Bill also defines ADR as including mediation, arbitration, conciliation, or any other non-judicial procedure involving a neutral party in the decision-making process.

This new legislation also changes the requirements on how a Request for Resolution may be served.  Previously, there was some ambiguity in the law regarding whether a Request for Resolution had to be personally served.  The Court of Appeals addressed this ambiguity in the Cabrini Villas HOA case.  Realizing that it was becoming difficult for associations to comply with the ADR service requirements, the new law states that the Request for Resolution may be made by personal delivery, first class mail, express mail, fax, or any other means that would reasonably be assumed to notify the receiving party.

AB 1836 also repeals the provisions of Court of Civil Procedure 383, and adds Section 1368.3 to the Civil Code in its place.  Section 1368.3 provides that an association is entitled to institute, defend, settle, or intervene in litigation, arbitration, mediation, or administrative proceedings in its own name as the real party interest without joining the individual owners in certain disputes.

AB 1836 also amends Civil Code Section 1357.120 to reflect that associations are required to adopt an internal procedure for dispute resolution and that any procedures to be adopted by the Board are subject to the notice and rule change requirements of Civil Code Sections 1357.130 and 1357.140.  This Bill also adds two new requirements to Sections 1357.130 and 1357.140 (which are the sections adopted last year which require notice to members before the Board makes a rule change and allow members of an Association to reverse a rule change, respectively.  Essentially, the amendments to Sections 1357.130 and 1357.140 require that the Internal Dispute Resolution process adopted by an association must comply with the requirements of Section 1357.100 et seq, which means that before it becomes the law of an association, it must first be distributed to the members, to allow them an opportunity to oppose the new procedure.

Associations Must Adopt a Procedure for Internal Dispute Resolution

AB 1836 requires that associations either establish their own procedures for Internal Dispute Resolution or use the procedure set forth in new Civil Code Section 1363.840.  The procedures set forth in Section 1363.840 are as follows:

1. Either the association or a homeowner may request that the other meet and confer in an effort to resolve a dispute involving their rights, duties or liabilities under the Davis-Stirling Common Interest Development Act, the Nonprofit Mutual Benefit Corporation law, or the governing documents of the common interest development.  The request must be in writing.
2. Either the homeowner receiving such a request from the association may refuse to meet and confer.  However, if the association receives such a request from a homeowner, the association must accept the homeowner’s request to meet and confer.
3. The association’s board of directors must designate a member of the board to meet and confer with the homeowner.
4. The designated member of the board of directors and the homeowner shall meet promptly at a mutually convenient time and place; explain their positions to each other and confer in good faith in an effort to resolve this dispute.
5. Any resolution of the dispute agreed to by the designated member of the board of directors and the homeowner must be memorialized in writing and signed by the designated member of the board of directors and the homeowner.

The association has the option of using the above procedure or may adopt its own process.  If the board of directors chooses to adopt its own process, the process is subject to the following:

1. The meet and confer process must be “fair and reasonable.”
2. The process must provide the right for either the association or a homeowner to invoke the process in writing.
3. The procedure must provide prompt deadlines.
4. The procedure must allow for the homeowner and the association to explain their positions and provide the right of appeal by the homeowner to the board of the association.

This new requirement of “a meet and confer” process is intended to foster communication, and that communication will not be binding on either the association or the disgruntled or rule-violating homeowner.  Assuming the agreement made through the meet and confer process is in writing, that resolution may be judicially enforceable, as long as the resolution is not in conflict with the law or the governing documents of the community association, and the agreement is either consistent with the authority granted by the Board of Directors to its designated representative or is ratified by the Board of Directors.

In developing an Internal Dispute Resolution process, Civil Code Section 1363.820(b) requires associations to “make maximum, reasonable use of available local Dispute Resolution programs involving a neutral third party, including low-cost mediation programs, such as those listed on the internet web sites of the Department of Consumer Affairs, and the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development.”

Conceivably, the meet and confer process implemented by a Board of Directors could include use of a mediation service.  However, this new law specifically states that no fee can be charged to the member for participating in the Board’s informal meet and confer process.  Should the dispute not be resolved and be subject to the formal ADR process, the cost of the ADR will be shared equally by the association and the homeowner.

AB 1836 requires that associations annually provide the members with a summary that specifically states:

Failure of a member of the association to comply with the alternative dispute resolution requirements of Section 1369.520 of the Civil Code may result in the loss of your right to sue the association or another member of the association regarding enforcement of the governing documents or the applicable law.

The summary must be provided “either at the time the pro forma budget required by Civil Code Section 1365 is distributed, or in the manner prescribed in Section 5016 of the Corporations Code.  The summary shall include a description of the association’s Internal Dispute Resolution process as required by Section 1363.850.”

Any new procedures adopted by the Board of Directors related to the Resolution of Disputes must comply with Civil Code Section 1357.130 and 1357.140, the procedure for enacting new rules (which, among other things, requires that the new rule or procedure be distributed to the members prior to becoming enforceable and allows members to vote to reverse a rule change).

That’s right, it’s budget time again.

Community managers and Board members are hard at work preparing their associations’ budgets and other required disclosure documents. As we do each year, Swedelson & Gottlieb is providing you with our 2004 Annual Disclosure Checklist.

The Checklist is in Adobe Acrobat PDF document format and can be downloaded by clicking on the following link. Download 2004ADC.pdf

Please contact our office at 800.372.2207 if you have any difficulties with the download.

Click here to download the Annual Disclosure Checklist.

Once again, it’s time for community managers and board members to begin preparing association budgets as well as preparing to distribute other required disclosure documents. As we do each year, Swedelson & Gottlieb is pleased to provide you with our updated Annual Budget and Disclosure Checklist.

The provisions of the California Civil Code governing community associations require that you provide members with an ever-growing list of disclosure information, including the “pro forma operating budget,” which must include, among other things, information regarding the association’s expenses, income and reserves.

Other required disclosures include information concerning owners’ rights as members of the association. Much of the information required by the Civil Code must be distributed to homeowners within a 60-day window “not less than 30 days nor more than 90 days” prior to the beginning of the association’s fiscal year.

For those community associations operating under a fiscal year that coincides with the calendar year, the disclosures must be distributed not later than December 1, 2006. For those community associations whose fiscal year commences on a date other than January 1, 2007, the information in this newsletter should be utilized by calculating the appropriate calendar deadlines prior to the commencement of the new fiscal year. Keep in mind that there are important legislative changes effective in 2007, some of which will affect what disclosures are required.

BUDGETING FOR BAD DEBT

As indicated in last year’s Annual Budget and Disclosure Checklist, we advised that real estate experts expected real estate sales and price increases to slow down and foreclosure activity to rise in 2006 due to the large number of risky 100% financed “interest-only” and variable interest rate mortgages retained by buyers, and we advised you to consider budgeting for the likelihood that some owners would not pay their assessments. Indeed, the California real estate market is in a slowdown and foreclosures have tripled from September 2005 to September 2006, which includes a 19% increase from August to September alone. We are optimistic that our Association Lien Services company will continue to successfully collect delinquent assessments, but if a home is foreclosed on by a senior trust deed, it is not always possible to collect assessments. Do the words “upside down” mean anything to you? For those of us who have been around awhile, back in the old days (before 1995), many owners found that they had no equity as the value of their homes were less than their loans. Many let their homes go as they were “upside down.”

As this trend shows few signs of weakening and there are still a large number of high-risk mortgages encumbering California real estate, we continue to advise you to allow for a reasonable amount of bad debt in your 2007 budgets.

BUDGETING FOR COST OF DOCUMENT INSPECTION BY OWNERS

As of July 1, 2006, new Civil Code Section 1365.2 greatly expanded the types of documents homeowners are entitled to inspect. Now, homeowners are not limited merely to inspecting financial reports, but are able to see bank statements, cancelled checks, contracts and other financial documents. An association has an obligation to redact, which means to edit a document to omit confidential and/or privileged information, such as information relating to the names of employees, social security numbers, account numbers, etc. Unfortunately, the legislature only allows an association to charge a homeowner $10 per hour and a maximum of $200 for preparing and providing the requested documents. It is expected that some associations will require an attorney’s assistance in the proper preparation of confidential and/or privileged documents that may be requested by a homeowner.

Although associations are only allowed to charge homeowners $10 per hour (up to $200 total) to prepare requested documents, which costs include attorney services, management companies may charge the associations their extra hourly fees for their services, if required. Additional fees charged by management for these services are probably justified, and associations are encouraged to add additional monies into their budgets for these additional management services. The amount that should be budgeted depends on the size of the association and the history of the association’s homeowner requests for documents.

ANTICIPATING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS

The California Civil Code also details what is required to be stated or presented in an association’s budget and financial reports. In addition to the budget and other required financial disclosures, the Code requires that associations, through their boards of directors, prepare a statement as to whether “the association has determined or anticipates that the levy of one or more special assessments will be required to repair, replace or restore any major component or to provide adequate reserves therefore.” The Civil Code now imposes greater disclosure obligations regarding reserves and the precise amount of increased assessments for the association’s fiscal year.

Associations need to take a good, hard look at their proposed budgets and anticipated expenses for the new fiscal year and determine whether any special assessments will be required.

This has been an issue with several associations where the board knew, or should have known, of the need for a special assessment to fund the cost of a common area repair, or replacement project, for which there were no monies in reserve, but failed to advise the members.

Some associations are purposefully choosing to under-fund reserves and rely on special assessments for common area repair or replacement projects under the theory that the homeowners who will benefit immediately from the repair should pay for it. While such a practice may be in technical compliance with Civil Code requirements because an association is not required to establish reserves, the 2005 changes to the Civil Code require that the board of directors carefully review what projects it believes will need to be undertaken and determine whether the association has sufficient funds or will require a special assessment and make the appropriate disclosure.

Some associations are disguising assessment increases by calling them “special assessments.” Rather than increase the regular assessment, some associations are levying special assessments of a set amount, per month, to fund repair programs or reserves when, in reality, this money should be part of the regular assessments. Such a practice could be challenged by homeowners. In order to be in compliance with Civil Code mandates, it is appropriate to present this information in the budget.

DISCLOSURE OF ALLEGED VIOLATIONS OF GOVERNING DOCUMENTS

There is another important disclosure that some association boards are failing to make: escrow notification of alleged violations of association governing documents. Although not part of the annual disclosure obligations, not only can this disclosure assist the association in CC&R and Rules and Regulation enforcement, but the association’s failure to make such a disclosure may adversely effect an association’s enforcement rights.

Along with all other documents delivered to escrow on behalf of an owner, the California Civil Code requires associations to provide a copy or summary of any notice previously sent to an owner that sets forth any alleged violations of the governing documents which remain unresolved at the time of the request. This means that associations are obligated to disclose to prospective owners any CC&Rs or Rules and Regulation violations alleged to have occurred on a homeowner’s property. Disclosure may compel the seller to correct the violation, as the prospective buyer will not want to inherit the problem.

THE NEW ELECTION LAW AND ITS IMPACT ON ASSOCIATION BUDGETS AND DISCLOSURES

As you hopefully are aware, as of July 1, 2006, California Civil Code Section 1363.03 sets forth the requirements that community associations are required to follow for association elections and certain other votes by association members (if this is news to you, please visit our blog and see our updates at www.hoalawblog.com). Some associations can expect to incur additional costs relating to printing of envelopes, ballots, election materials and potentially fees to retain an independent third party as inspector of election, such as an accountant, to provide the services needed during a membership vote. While you may avoid some of these expenses by finding a willing volunteer to serve as inspector of election, associations should examine their alternatives and budget accordingly.

The new election law creates additional disclosure responsibilities for associations. Election rules adopted pursuant to Civil Code Section 1363.03 are operating rules and must be sent to the members for a 30-day review period prior to adopting or changing the election rules. Associations must also give notice that the board has adopted the election rules within 15 days of their vote to adopt the rules (the procedure described in Civil Code Section 1357.130 for operating rules listed in Civil Code Section 1357.120). Additionally, within 15 days of an election, the board must publicize the tabulated results of the election in a communication directed to all members.

NEW REQUIREMENTS REGARDING INITIATION OF FORECLOSURE

The changes to California Civil Code §1365.1 and §1367.4 now require that delinquent assessments amount to at least $1,800 or are one (1) year delinquent prior to initiating foreclosure.

Associations are prohibited from foreclosing on an assessment lien unless either: (1) The amount of the assessments owed (not including costs, interest, or accelerated assessments) is $1,800 or (2) one (1) year of delinquency has passed on any unpaid assessments.

Note that payment plans do not stay the running of the one (1) year of delinquency. Here’s a tip - when levying a large special assessment, do not levy with monthly payments. Instead, have the whole amount of the special assessment due in thirty (30) days, or offer a payment plan as an accommodation. This protects the Association against an owner that sells, allows for acceleration if there is a default, and provides other benefits.

BOARD OF DIRECTORS MUST VOTE TO RECORD A LIEN

California Civil Code §1367.1(c)(B)(2) now requires that a majority of the Board of Directors must vote to decide to record a lien at an open Meeting (not Executive Session). The decision of the Board must then be recorded in the minutes of the meeting.

Note that there is no language in the statute that requires that the owner remain anonymous at this point in the proceeding, but there are requirements that the owner’s information be kept confidential in the minutes of the Executive Meeting that votes on whether to notice the sale. There is, however, the potential liability for slander (spoken) or libel (written in the minutes). Do not use the owner’s name.

David C. Swedelson
Sandra L. Gottlieb

Click here to download the Annual Disclosure Checklist.

As you hopefully know by now, as of July 1, 2006, the way all California community associations conduct elections and membership votes was changed. Among the major changes is the requirement that all elections and certain other membership votes be held by secret ballot pursuant to operating rules. This includes votes for the selection and removal of members of the board, amendments to the governing documents, votes regarding assessments, and the grant of exclusive use common area. In addition, the role of the inspectors of election has grown significantly, and the use of proxies, while still permitted, may not be as prevalent as in the past. This new law affects all community associations, irrespective of their size. Failure to comply with the new law could subject an association to a challenge in small claims court. Because this new law is so complex, we are receiving a lot of questions. In response, we present the following frequently asked questions:

1. Our Association has always had secret ballots; can't we just keep on holding our annual elections as we have been doing for years?

The simple answer is no. The new election law was adopted because Senator Battin from the Coachella Valley somehow came to believe that fraud was rampant within association elections. This was news to us. If an association does not comply with the new law, which includes, among other things, the adoption of election rules and procedures, which specify procedures for voting by secret ballot, designating and detailing the responsibilities of the inspector(s) of election, the voting results can be challenged and a fine imposed on the association. We do not believe that the new election law is required as we certainly do not see rampant fraud at associations, but it is the law and if you do not fully comply, there are potential serious consequences.

2. What is required for the election rules and procedures - do they need to be approved by the members?

New Civil Code Section 1363.03 provides that the new election rules and procedures must provide, among other things, that the association allow for equal access for all candidates or members to advocate their point of view in all association media (via newsletter, websites, etc.); that the association provide access to common area meeting space at no cost to all candidates and members who advocate a point of view during a campaign; set forth the qualifications of candidates for the board; set procedures for the nomination of candidates; set qualifications for voting; establish a method for selecting the inpector(s) of election and who can serve as an inspector of election. This new law specifically provides that these rules must be treated like other "operating" rules and sent out to the members for their comment thirty (30) days before being adopted by the board of directors. However, regardless of member comment, it is the board's decision whether to adopt the rules; the members do not vote on them.

3. What happens if we don't have election rules and procedures?

The failure to adopt election rules and procedures means that actual results of the voting can be contested in small claims court.

4. Do these voting rules and procedures only apply to the election of board members or to voting on other matters as well?

The new law provides a list of different votes that are taken by the members in accordance with the election rules - the election or removal of the board members, voting regarding assessments, amendment of the governing documents, and the grant of exclusive use common area.

5. We are a small association of only 10 units. My board does not want to have to make rules or follow the new law regarding secret ballots. Can a majority of the homeowners decide that we don't want to follow this new law?

Unfortunately, Senator Battin (and the California legislature) did not believe that there was any need to differentiate between larger and smaller associations; all community associations subject to the Davis-Stirling Act must follow the new election law. Any homeowner that wants to challenge the results of an election may do so by going to small claims court, and a small claims judge not only has the power to invalidate the election results, but also has the power to impose a fine of up to $500 per violation. Although there may not be any homeowners today that even know about these new election laws, it only takes one disgruntled homeowner to file a small claims action involving the results of your election. This does not even take into consideration the question that if the results of the election are invalidated, is there a board of directors in place to make decisions, sign checks, etc.?

6. What exactly has to be provided in the upper left hand corner of the outer secret ballot envelope?

The following must appear in the upper-left hand corner of the outer secret ballot envelope:

• Written or pre-printed voter’s name
• Written or pre-printed voter’s address or separate interest identifier that entitles him or her to vote (such as parcel, unit or lot number - can simply be the voter's full address)
• Voter’s signature

7. What if a homeowner doesn't know their parcel or lot number?

By recent amendments to Civil Code Section 1363.03 (effective 7/1/06), it is no longer necessary that an owner place their parcel or lot number as long as the voter can be identified from the information provided (address and unit number may be sufficient).

8. Does everyone need to fill out a candidacy notice, including existing Board members who are running for reelection?

Some election rules provide for candidacy notices to be sent out to the membership, and the answer would depend on how your election rules are drafted since the code does not address candidacy notices. Candidacy notices are just one way to provide equal access for those persons running for election. It is a good idea to provide in your election rules that all candidates, regardless of whether they are running for reelection, must fill out a candidacy notice.

9. Should the inner envelope say only "SECRET BALLOT" or does it also need to include an address?

The inner envelope should say no more than: "Secret Ballot, to be opened by the Inspector of Election only." It should not be marked with any identifying information by anyone.

10. Do we need to send homeowners a proxy? How do we let homeowners know that they can give a proxy to someone and what needs to be on it?

If the governing documents don’t require the Association to send a proxy, you are not obligated to do so. The requirements for proxies are set forth in the Corporations Code and should be addressed in the election rules. The Inspector(s) of Election validates proxies. All proxies must be exchanged for Secret Ballots because the proxy itself can’t be voted.

11. Is it 1 Inspector under 100 units and 3 for 100 + units?

No, it's one or three at the Board’s discretion. If the Board fails to designate the Inspector(s), the members may vote on the appointment.

12. What if five members are up for election, all five want to run again and no candidacy notices are received by the deadline? What is the use of having nominations from the floor if a member can't change their vote once it has been mailed?

Recently amended Civil Code Section 1363.03 makes clear that nominations may be allowed from the floor if provided for in the rules and not prohibited by the governing documents. This helps in cases where nominations are not received in advance of the meeting. A member may wish to refrain from voting until the meeting itself in order to ensure the member knows all of the choices available. The member shouldn't mail their ballot unless they are sure of their vote. Another option is to write in a candidate that is not yet nominated, mail the ballot, and then nominate that candidate from the floor at the meeting. It is obviously an advantage for a candidate to return the candidacy notice within the time provided so that candidate is on the ballot. Also, elections by acclamation are no longer allowed (a vote must still be taken where the number of candidates is equal to the number of open board positions).

13. Do only members not planning on attending the meeting need to mail in their secret ballots? The members attending can bring them in but they must be in the 2 sealed envelopes...correct?

Yes. But mailing in your ballot does not mean you cannot attend the meeting. Members can complete their secret ballots and seal them at the meeting. We recommend the board, manager or Inspector(s) bring extra blank secret ballots and envelopes to the meeting in case someone lost their voting materials, etc. and needs a replacement.

14. What if quorum is not achieved?

Remember that even secret ballots received by mail count as members present at the meeting for quorum purposes, so be sure to count them towards quorum. Also, the Inspector(s) should not open any envelopes until quorum is satisfied (if quorum is not satisfied, move to adjourn the meeting and check to see if your governing documents have a provision for reduced quorum at an adjourned meeting).



We encourage all associations to comply with the new law. If you would like more information, there are additional articles on this blog and our website, or you may e-mail our office and we will be glad to forward you additional documents.

Please do not shoot the messenger as we are only reporting the news. On September 18, 2006, the Governor signed S.B. 1560 (the “Amendment”), which modifies recently enacted Civil Code Section 1363.03. This “cleanup bill” clarifies some troublesome issues, which will hopefully allow associations to get through the election process more efficiently.

• §1363.03(e)(1)

One of the provisions in 1363.03 required homeowners, when voting by secret ballot, to write his or her name in their own hand on the exterior envelope sent to the inspector(s) of election and state their unit, lot or tract number. The Amendment allows an owner to sign the exterior envelope and indicate the owner’s name or address or separate interest identifier that entitles that owner to vote. Therefore, the homeowner will no longer have to print their name, unit, lot and tract number in their own hand but may instead utilize a label. However, the member is still required to sign his or her name.

• §1363.03(f)

The changes to Civil Code Section 1363.03 now confirm what we already knew to be the case, that once the inspector receives the ballot, it is not revocable. This change can be found at 1363.03(f). An additional change to 1363.03(f) allows the inspector or the inspector’s third party designee to verify members’ information and signature on the outer envelope of the secret ballot prior to the meeting at which the ballots are tabulated. We had been very concerned that only the inspector(s) of election could perform this job and only perform it at the meeting. Now, the inspector(s) can designate third parties to help perform some of the work and allows for the signature on the outer envelope to be verified (this will help with reaching quorum) prior to the meeting.

• §1363.03(m)

1363.03(m) has been added to confirm that the secret ballot procedure is not required for votes cast by delegates or other elected representatives, but only for votes cast directly by members of the association.

• §1363.03(d)(1)(A)

Another important change defines a proxy (this is a new definition for the code) as “a written authorization signed by a member or the authorized representative of the member that gives another member or members the power to vote on behalf of that member.” (Emphasis added.) In the past, a proxy could be given to any third party whether they were the member, the member’s attorney or a family member unrelated to the association. Now, a proxy can only be given to a member.

• §1363.03(d)(1)(B)

The word “signed” is now defined as “the placing of the member’s name on the proxy, whether by manual signature, typewriting, telegraphic transmission or otherwise by the member or authorized representative of the member.” This is important because it clarifies whether faxed signatures count; they do.

• §1363.03(d)(2)

The cleanup legislation clarifies that proxies may not be construed or used in lieu of a ballot. The modifications to the Civil Code provide that if proxies are permitted or required by an association’s bylaws, and if the proxy meets the statutory requirements, they shall be used. However, associations are not required to prepare or distribute proxies pursuant to Section 1363.03. A member may revoke his or her proxy prior to the receipt of the secret ballot by the inspector(s) of election pursuant to Section 1363.03(d)(3).

• §1363.03(b)

An important concern has been the quorum requirement. The Amendment provides that if quorum is required for elections in the governing documents or other provisions of law, each secret ballot received by the inspector(s) shall be treated as a member present at a meeting for purposes of establishing a quorum (1363.03(b)). We believe that since the ballot is contained within the first and second envelope referenced above, when the envelope is received, it can be used for establishing quorum. Since quorum is determined by ballots, if an envelope is received without a ballot enclosed, then the empty envelope would not count toward quorum.

Additionally, this same subparagraph adds to the already designated four issues for which secret ballots must be utilized to include the removal (recall) of directors.

Unfortunately, these changes did not go as far as we would have liked. However, the changes are significant and clarify many unanswered questions that followed the enactment of Civil Code Section 1363.03.

Wondering where you can find sample annual meeting and secret ballot forms? Look no further. Click on the links below to find some handy reference.

These forms are provided as reference only and do not constitute legal advice. Swedelson and Gottlieb makes no representations as to whether these forms are suitable for any purpose. Consult an attorney before using any of these forms.

Download Secret Ballot Form

Download Secret Ballot Instructions

Download Candidacy Notice

Download Notice of Annual Meeting

It comes up all the time. A resident wants to attend and participate at a board meeting or wants to serve on the board of directors. That resident may be a tenant or the significant other of an actual owner of that property, or perhaps the beneficiary of a trust or shareholder of a corporation that owns the property. Often, governing documents state that only an "owner of record" can serve on the board, and the Open Meeting Act states that "any member of the association may attend a meeting of the board of directors of the association." Electing a non-owner to the board of directors, when the governing documents require ownership as a qualification, could jeopardize the legality of the board's decisions, and perhaps even insurance coverage.

Black’s Law Dictionary defines an "owner" of real property as a person who is vested with title to property and has a right to enjoy that property and do with it as he or she pleases. The "Record Owner" is usually defined in the CC&Rs as the "owner of the Title" at the time of notice. But does this mean that the association is required to go out and check Title? Not necessarily. Typically, the owner of record at a community association is the owner on the association's records based on the information that was provided, perhaps through escrow, when the unit was sold. Some management company agreements obligate the manager to a higher level of record keeping by requiring that the manager keep not only a list of the homeowners, but rather a "current list." This rather innocuous phrase could actually place an ongoing obligation on the manager to verify correct ownership. If that's your intention, great; if not, contracts should be rephrased. The association is entitled to rely on its records, unless it is provided proof by way of a recorded deed, that ownership (in whole or in part) has been transferred to someone new. A resident may present the association with a copy of a quit claim deed, showing that he or she may own all or a portion of the property, but that deed may not have been recorded. Then that person would not necessarily be the "owner of record," at least not recognized by the County Recorder's Office as the owner, and thus should not be considered by the association to be an owner.

Record Owner

It is important to determine who the owner of the property is because many activities (read most) at common interest developments require the owner to be the Record Owner of the property. Only a Record Owner can make decisions on behalf of a unit/lot as it relates to association matters. Association disputes over ownership generally arise over the issue of "legal ownership" and are usually easily resolved by determining identity of the property owner as listed on the recorded grant deed.

Prior planning and organization should allow a board or manager to ascertain who the true Record Owner of the property is prior to mailing ballots or holding official meetings of the members. Most CC&Rs require homeowners to provide the association with the names and addresses of the Record Owners. In fact, Corporation Code Section 8320 places the obligation on the corporation or unincorporated non-profit association to maintain a list of all homeowners and their addresses. It is the association's obligation, even prior to an annual meeting, to ascertain who is the record owner for the purpose of collecting assessments and enforcing the governing documents. Because state statute provides that the levy of assessments is a debt of the owner at the time the assessment was levied, going after the correct owner for payment is important, not only to the association's financial health, but also to limit the association's liability for proceeding against the wrong person or entity for a debt.

Under California law, a recorded interest has priority over an unrecorded interest. That means if two owners claim a right of ownership to a piece of property, the association should treat the Record Owner, the person listed on the recorded grant deed, as the true owner. The same holds true even where a homeowner acquires title to their unit/lot by a quit claim deed, provided, of course, that the deed is recorded. When an unrecorded grant deed is involved or if more than one person claims a right of ownership under a separate recorded grant deed or a representative of a trust claims the ownership, the issue can become murky. If no recorded deed exists or more than one recorded deed is discovered. Management should, based on the Davis-Stirling Common Interest Development Act, refer to recorded interests only. Other statutes, not specific to homeowner associations, provide that a grant deed is valid and enforceable even if not recorded as long as the grant deed gives notice to all. However, what is more commonly found is that the notice of ownership has not been given to all prospective buyers and does not provide legal notice as required by law.

First In Time, First In Right

If there is an ownership dispute between record owners and management does not know who to allow to vote (who gets the ballot), management should rely on Civil Code Sections 1213 through 1220, which provide, when more than one grant deed exists, the "Record Owner" will be the person(s) whose grant deed was recorded first. For example, if a homeowner were to record her or his deed to a unit/lot in 2002 and a subsequent grant deed for that same unit/lot was recorded by another person in 2003, without there being a chain of title that satisfies the transfer of property, the Record Owner would be the homeowner who recorded first.

Trust Ownership

A problem occurring more and more frequently arises when property is owned in trust. When conducting check in at an official meeting or sending out a written ballot, if a trust ownership is presented, the association should require official verification that the person who wants to vote on behalf of the trust is authorized to do so. The individual is usually the trustee of the trust. Interestingly, although the trustee does not own the property, the trustee has the same legal rights to act on behalf of the property as those that would be afforded any other ownership rights of the association. It is incumbent upon associations to advise homeowners that, if they are a trustee of a trust, they need to provide trust documentation to establish that they have the authority as referenced above.

Most times it seems the ownership issue is a problem only in contested elections or when certain members of the association have an agenda. Management's agenda is to make sure the right owners are representing the memberships in the association. Following the above guidelines will guarantee your success.