by

(and why condominium associations should be responsible for waterproofing on balcony decks)

By David C. Swedelson, Condo Lawyer and HOA legal expert; Senior Partner at SwedelsonGottlieb
I know that many boards contemplate the idea of making owners responsible for the waterproofing on the balconies or decks in condominiums (and yes, generally the association is responsible for repairing or replacing what is considered common area waterproofing). Bad idea. The reality is that owners will not do what is required, and the leaks will damage the common area and other units. One association client learned this the hard way. And while the end result was good for the association and we consider this an excellent result, the road was rocky and stressful. And the association had to finance our fees and the costs.

It all started with that association amending and restating its Governing Documents (through another firm). As a part of that process, their former attorney suggested that they make the homeowners responsible for the maintenance, repair and replacement of the waterproofing on each homeowner’s exclusive use balcony decks. Many associations tell me they would like to see the homeowners responsible for the waterproofing, as they claim that the association does not want to have to save or expend the money for that work. However, in practice this is not a good idea.
Continue reading

by

Posted by David C. Swedelson,
Partner, SwedelsonGottlieb; Community Association Legal Expert
With the proliferation of electric vehicles comes a new law that limits and restricts California community associations’ ability to prohibit an owner from installing their own electric charging station. On July 25, Governor Brown signed Senate Bill 209, which adds new Civil Code Section 1353.9. The new law takes effect January 1, 2012.

New Civil Code Section 1353.9 will prohibit California condominium and other community associations from unreasonably restricting the installation of electric vehicle charging stations. Homeowners who place charging stations in the common areas will be responsible for costs associated with maintaining and repairing the station, as well as costs for damage to common areas and adjacent units resulting from installation and maintenance of the station. The new law will impose other responsibilities on the homeowner, including maintaining a liability insurance coverage of $1,000,000 that names the association as an additional insured.

Unfortunately, the new law allows individual owners to use or occupy common areas, contrary to existing statutes and case law. In his signing message, Governor Brown stated that the author of the bill plans to introduce legislation that protects the right of common interest developments to establish reasonable rules for any use of common areas for charging stations. Governor Brown recognized this issue in his signing message:
Continue reading

by

Blog posting by David Swedelson, California HOA and Condo Lawyer and Legal Expert
Interesting article and perspective regarding the Federal Housing Administration’s (FHA’s) new guidelines for condominium loan offers from fellow community association attorney Stephan Marcus (Massachusetts).

Steve notes that “the FHA published the first iteration of this guidance in June 2009, with little, if any, input from the community association industry. The FHA’s new Guidelines, unveiled in late June 2011, indicate that FHA officials listened to the concerns expressed by the Community Associations Institute (CAI) and others, and responded to at least some of them. Apparently CAI is challenging the latest guidelines arguing that FHA violated both the Administrative Procedures Act and its own rule-making procedures by failing to consult affected industries and interest groups.”

The new FHA Guidelines are available at this link.

Steve states that although improved in some areas, the revised guidelines are still problematic and believes that in some cases, they are even more problematic than before.
Continue reading

by

By David Swedelson, California Condo and HOA Legal Expert and Community Association Attorney

I came across an interesting article from a law firm in Florida (by attorney Lisa Magill with Becker & Poliakoff) that addresses the fact that after a bank forecloses, many boards are writing off the debt without considering all of the association’s collection options.

Yes, it is true that trying to collect from some delinquent owners may be a waste of time. But a board should be cautious in making that assumption without knowing if the homeowner has or does not have money or other assets. Boards should consider evaluating collection options.
Continue reading

by

By David Swedelson, Community Association Attorney and Partner at SwedelsonGottlieb

The Davis-Stirling Common Interest Development Act is the common name of the portion of the California Civil Code beginning with section 1350, which governs condominium, cooperative, and planned unit development communities in California. It was enacted in 1985 by the California State Legislature and has been amended over 45 times.

There are many homeowner associations that look like any other and collect fees and assessments, but in fact are not subject to the Davis-Stirling Act based on the holdings in Mount Olympus Property Owners Ass’n v. Shpirt, 59 Cal. App. 4th 885 (Cal. App. 2d Dist. 1997) and Comm. to Save the Beverly Highlands Homes Ass’n v. Beverly Highlands Homes Ass’n, 92 Cal. App. 4th 1247 (Cal. App. 2d Dist. 2001).

Continue reading

by

The following is excerpted and edited by David Swedelson from an article prepared by Jan Frankel Schau Mediator/Arbitrator/Attorney. Jan was an associate at SwedelsonGottlieb several years ago.

How many times have you been in a meeting with the board and a homeowner regarding the owner’s violation of the rules, CC&Rs or addressing damage they have caused to the common area? Many, I bet. And how many times have you cringed because neither the board nor the owner could get to closure on a deal, a settlement of the dispute. Everyone danced around the issues, but no one knew how to close a deal. Many people educated in negotiation tactics or skills have some tools they use to make a deal. Jan Schau analogizes to the TV show, “Pawn Stars.”

She says that she hesitates to admit it, but she has learned a thing or two about negotiation from the TV show, “Pawn Stars”. She goes on to state that in this show (which I myself have enjoyed viewing), the owners of a Las Vegas Pawn Shop negotiate face to face to purchase used and unwanted “treasures” that have an unknown or uncertain value. Invariably, the “final offer” is accompanied by a smile, an extended hand and an expectation that the seller will accept that offer, even though it doesn’t meet his last demand. The owners of the pawn shop are adept at making every seller feel great about selling their junk/treasures and getting a great deal in exchange.

Here’s how it works in the context of a board and owner at a community association:
Continue reading

by

By David Swedelson, California Condo and HOA Attorney, Senior Partner SwedelsonGottlieb

All too often we are called in to deal with a dispute over a contract that the association entered into with a contractor or vendor. And I am often surprised to learn that the board and management really do not understand what a binding contract is (and what it is not).
What needs to be understood is that the foundation of every legal transaction is the document known as a contract.
Continue reading

by

On Tuesday, June 28, 2011, David Swedelson of SwedelsonGottlieb and Timothy Cline of Timothy Cline Insurance Agency will present their technology program, “Beyond Ctrl, Alt, Del (Taking your Tech to the Next Level)” at Community Association Institute’s Channel Islands Chapter.

Download this PDF page for a handy link reference to some of the cutting edge technologies covered in the program.

by

By David Swedelson, Senior Partner, SwedelsonGottlieb

As reported in several publications, including this article from MSNBC, Timothy Adams, a member of a homeowners association in Omaha, Nebraska, has taken some unusual steps to engender support for his fight against his homeowners association as he battles to keep solar panels installed on his home.

According to the MSNBC article, homeowner Adams is being sued by South Shore Heights Homeowners Association after he refused to take down the solar panels he had installed on his roof. While we have seen owners publicize their positions in letters in an effort to garner fellow owner support for their positions, Adams is spending a lot of money (and vows to spend even more) trying to generate support for his cause by putting up billboards, launching a webpage, sending letters to neighbors and utilizing social media.

OmahaBillboardSolar.jpg
Continue reading

by

By Joan E. Lewis-Heard, Esq., Attorney, SwedelsonGottlieb

Edited by David C. Swedelson, Esq.

Many California condominium associations have common area storage lockers, rooms or areas that are made available to the owners. Sometimes, the storage area is assigned in a deed as exclusive use common area. More often than not, these areas are not assigned, and the board has the ability to assign and rent them to owners. And boards and the association’s management often have no idea of the issues that storage areas can create until they are smack dab in the middle of a dispute with an owner.

Continue reading
Contact Information
Los Angeles
 11900 W Olympic Blvd #580
Los Angeles, CA 90064
310.207.2207
In California: 1.800.372.2207
Fax: 310.207.2115
San Francisco
 415.762.1889
Fax: 415.762.1888
Orange County
 One Park Plaza #600
Irvine, CA 92614
949.209.4322
Fax: 949.209.4323
Ventura County
 805.650.7899
Fax: 805.988.0570
Palm Desert
77711 Flora Rd #358
Palm Desert, CA 92211
760.479.5474

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Please do not include any confidential or sensitive information in a contact form, text message, or voicemail. The contact form sends information by non-encrypted email, which is not secure. Submitting a contact form, sending a text message, making a phone call, or leaving a voicemail does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Copyright © 2016 – 2025, SwedelsonGottlieb
JUSTIA Law Firm Blog Design