HOA Law Blog
Articles Posted in Davis-Stirling Act
November 17, 2005 Teleconference
As of January 1, 2006, Senate Bill 137 takes effect and the civil code sections regarding assessment collection drastically alter the collection process. In addition, the new law will prohibit associations from foreclosing on an assessment lien unless the amount of assessments owed (not including costs or interest) is $1,800 or one year of delinquency has passed on any unpaid assessments.
Our attorneys have been diligently researching and deciphering every aspect of this new law. As a courtesy, SwedelsonGottlieb/Association Lien Services will be hosting a teleconference on Thursday, November 17, 2005, at 10:00 a.m., to explain new civil code changes. There will be time at the end of the conference for questions to be answered. Just prior to the audio conference call seminar we will send you, via email, an outline and timetable or you can download a copy at https://www.hoalawblog.com. If you cannot call in at the scheduled time, you will have the option of calling in later (within 24 hours from the scheduled call time) and listen to a recording of the conference call, questions asked and answers to questions.
To participate in our teleconference, please contact Jennie Swanson, (310) 207-2207 ext. 210 or jennie@sghoalaw.com, to receive the call-in number and password. An article on the new law is currently accessible on our blog site, https://www.hoalawblog.com, we recommend reviewing it prior to the teleconference to help formulate any questions you may want to ask.
2004 Annual Disclosure Checklist
That’s right, it’s budget time again.
Community managers and Board members are hard at work preparing their associations’ budgets and other required disclosure documents. As we do each year, Swedelson & Gottlieb is providing you with our 2004 Annual Disclosure Checklist.
The Checklist is in Adobe Acrobat PDF document format and can be downloaded by clicking on the following link. Download 2004ADC.pdf
What Is The Davis-Stirling Common Interest Development Act
The California State Legislature has passed many code sections or statutory laws that govern the formation and operation of condominium and homeowner associations. The Davis-Stirling Common Interest Development Act (Civil Code §§ 1350-1378) was first made law in 1986 and was intended to bring together in one area of the Civil Code the most important statutory laws regulating California community associations. The Act has been amended more than 45 times since enacted. These important code sections are set out below with explanations and articles.
Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger Vetoes AB 2598
We are very pleased to advise you that all of our efforts were successful and the Governor vetoed AB 2598, the assessment collection bill. We agree with the Governor’s reasons for the veto. His letter to the legislators is presented below. His reasons for his veto show he listened to what we had to say. We are willing to work on compromise legislation that may help eliminate some of the problems the proponents of this legislation expressed as their motivations for this legislation while at the same time preserving the non-judicial foreclosure process. We thank all of those who worked to defeat this bill and took the time to express their opposition to the legislature and the Governor.
Letter Sent By Schwarzenegger To California State Assembly
To the Members of the California State Assembly:
Civil Code § 1378 – Required Architectural Review Procedures; Exemptions.
(a) This section applies if an association’s governing documents require association approval before an owner of a separate interest may make a physical change to the owner’s separate interest or to the common area. In reviewing and approving or disapproving a proposed change, the association shall satisfy the following requirements:
(1) The association shall provide a fair, reasonable, and expeditious procedure for making its decision. The procedure shall be included in the association’s governing documents. The procedure shall provide for prompt deadlines. The procedure shall state the maximum time for response to an application or a request for reconsideration by the board of directors.
(2) A decision on a proposed change shall be made in good faith and may not be unreasonable, arbitrary, or capricious.
Civil Code § 1376 – Installation Of Video And Television Antenna.
(a) Any covenant, condition, or restriction contained in any deed, contract, security instrument, or other instrument affecting the transfer or sale of, or any interest in, a common interest development that effectively prohibits or restricts the installation or use of a video or television antenna, including a satellite dish, or that effectively prohibits or restricts the attachment of that antenna to a structure within that development where the antenna is not visible from any street or common area, except as otherwise prohibited or restricted by law, is void and unenforceable as to its application to the installation or use of a video or television antenna that has a diameter or diagonal measurement of 36 inches or less.
(b) This section shall not apply to any covenant, condition, or restriction, as described in subdivision (a), that imposes reasonable restrictions on the installation or use of a video or television antenna, including a satellite dish, that has a diameter or diagonal measurement of 36 inches or less. For purposes of this section, “reasonable restrictions” means those restrictions that do not significantly increase the cost of the video or television antenna system, including all related equipment, or significantly decrease its efficiency or performance and include all of the following:
(1) Requirements for application and notice to the association prior to the installation.
Civil Code § 1375.1 – Disclosure To Association Members Of Settlement Agreement Regarding Defects.
(a) As soon as is reasonably practicable after the association and the builder have entered into a settlement agreement or the matter has otherwise been resolved regarding alleged defects in the common areas, alleged defects in the separate interests that the association is obligated to maintain or repair, or alleged defects in the separate interests that arise out of, or are integrally related to, defects in the common areas or separate interests that the association is obligated to maintain or repair, where the defects giving rise to the dispute have not been corrected, the association shall, in writing, inform only the members of the association whose names appear on the records of the association that the matter has been resolved, by settlement agreement or other means, and disclose all of the following:
(1) A general description of the defects that the association reasonably believes, as of the date of the disclosure, will be corrected or replaced.
(2) A good faith estimate, as of the date of the disclosure, of when the association believes that the defects identified in paragraph (1) will be corrected or replaced. The association may state that the estimate may be modified.
Civil Code § 1375.05 – Construction Defect Litigation; Filing Of Complaint; Inspection Process; Expert Witness Depositions.
(a) Upon the completion of the mandatory prefiling dispute resolution process described in Section 1375, if the parties have not settled the matter, the association or its assignee may file a complaint in the superior court in the county in which the project is located. Those matters shall be given trial priority.
(b) In assigning trial priority, the court shall assign the earliest possible trial date, taking into consideration the pretrial preparation completed pursuant to Section 1375, and shall deem the complaint to have been filed on the date of service of the Notice of Commencement of Legal Proceedings described under Section 1375.
(c) Any respondent, subcontractor, or design professional who received timely prior notice of the inspections and testing conducted under Section 1375 shall be prohibited from engaging in additional inspection or testing, except if all of the following specific conditions are met, upon motion to the court: