June 4, 2009

Expert Testimony Is Properly Excluded Where Experts Relied On Unsupported Assumption That Mold Exposure Caused Plaintiff's Symptoms

On May 28, 2009, in the matter of Dee v. PCS Property Management Inc. the California Courts of Appeal - 2nd District ruled that proposed expert testimony is properly excluded where experts relied on unsupported assumption that mold exposure caused plaintiff's symptoms.

Continue reading "Expert Testimony Is Properly Excluded Where Experts Relied On Unsupported Assumption That Mold Exposure Caused Plaintiff's Symptoms" »