<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>HOA Law Blog</title>
      <link>http://www.hoalawblog.com/</link>
      <description>Published by David Swedelson of Swedelson &amp; Gottlieb</description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2009</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:03:35 -0800</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/?v=3.33</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

            <item>
         <title>Homeowner Association is Not Liable for Unforeseeable Injuries Caused to an Owner by a Tenant&apos;s Dog</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><strong><em>Chee v. Marina Seagate Condominiums</em>, (2006) 143 Cal.App.4th 1360, 50 Cal.Rptr.3d 40. </strong></p>

<p>Lila Chee (“Chee”) is a 71-year-old resident owner of a condominium at the Marina Seagate condominium complex. She was allegedly injured when a Jack Russell Terrier owned by Olga Kiymaz, at the time a tenant in the condominium next door, ran out of Kiymaz’s unit, unrestrained by a leash. The dog jumped on Chee, allegedly causing her to fall and sustain numerous injuries. Kiymaz rented the condominium from unit owner Jerome Brown. Chee filed a second amended complaint against Brown, the Marina Seagate Homeowners Association (“Association”), and others. Chee brought Brown and the Association (and Brown’s property managers who rented the unit to Kiymaz) into the lawsuit after Kiymaz filed for bankruptcy and was dismissed from the action. </p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.hoalawblog.com/2009/06/homeowner_association_is_not_l.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.hoalawblog.com/2009/06/homeowner_association_is_not_l.html</guid>
         <category>CC&amp;R and Rule Enforcement</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:03:35 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Secured Lenders Would Get A Full Recovery And This Is Why It Is Important That California Community Associations Move Quickly To Record Assessment Liens</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>The Wall Street Journal recently reported that secured bank lenders to General Motors would get a full recovery on $6 billion in loans made to the auto maker, under the bankruptcy plan being finalized by the U.S. Treasury.</p>

<p>If you are asking what this has to do with California community associations, then you need to read on. California community associations have the ability to secure a delinquent homeowners assessment obligation by recording an assessment lien.</p>

<p>With an increasing number of delinquent homeowners resorting to bankruptcy protection, it is more important than ever that California community associations move quickly with the assessment collection process and record a lien. Keep in mind that the lien cannot be recorded until 30 days after the pre-lien letter with all the required language and attachments (association collection policy, statement of account, etc.) has been sent out to the owner(s) in compliance with the California Civil Code. <a href="http://www.hoalawblog.com/2000/09/civil_code_13671_lien_for_deli.html">Click here</a> for more information on what is required for the pre-lien letter.</p>

<p>Unfortunately, many associations are taking too long to take action to collect the assessments that are unpaid and many of them find out too late (after the owner has filed bankruptcy) that as an unsecured creditor, they are likely not going to collect any of the delinquent assessments that were owed. </p>

<p>California law provides associations with the ability to record an assessment lien, and we encourage  all association managers and board members to take advantage of the protections built into the law. For more information on  recording an assessment lien, please contact Tracy Neal at <a href="mailto:trn@alslien.com">trn@alslien.com</a>.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.hoalawblog.com/2009/06/secured_lenders_would_get_a_fu.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.hoalawblog.com/2009/06/secured_lenders_would_get_a_fu.html</guid>
         <category>Assessment Collection</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 12:51:34 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Expert Testimony Is Properly Excluded Where Experts Relied On Unsupported Assumption That Mold Exposure Caused Plaintiff&apos;s Symptoms</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>On May 28, 2009, in the matter of Dee v. PCS Property Management Inc. the California Courts of Appeal - 2nd District ruled that proposed expert testimony is properly excluded where experts relied on unsupported assumption that <strong>mold exposure</strong> caused plaintiff's symptoms.<br />
 </p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.hoalawblog.com/2009/06/expert_testimony_is_properly_e.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.hoalawblog.com/2009/06/expert_testimony_is_properly_e.html</guid>
         <category>Mold</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 12:28:16 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Wall Street Journal Reports Assessment Delinquencies on the Rise</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>The Wall Street Journal reports that there is another sign that California’s foreclosures could jump in 2009: Delinquencies on dues (assessments) owed to homeowner associations have risen sharply. This is not a surprise to those of us in the trenches. Many managers report to us that they can barely keep up with the maintenance and repair issues because they are spending so much of their time dealing with delinquent assessment issues and matters. </p>

<p>The Wall Street Journal Article suggests that "[t]he homeowner association delinquency rate can serve as a leading indicator of sorts because homeowners usually stop paying dues before they stop paying their mortgage." <a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/developments/2009/05/06/another-sign-of-foreclosure-trouble-in-california/">Click here to read the article in the WSJ.</a></p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.hoalawblog.com/2009/05/wall_street_journal_reports_as.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.hoalawblog.com/2009/05/wall_street_journal_reports_as.html</guid>
         <category>Assessment Collection</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 14:56:13 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Delinquent Assessment / Foreclosure Report From Association Lien Services</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Association Lien Services has been successfully collecting delinquent assessments, non-judicially, for over twenty years and has weathered a few economic downturns along the way.  However, never before have we encountered such a perfect storm of economic turmoil.  In the past, as now, when there has been a burst in the real estate bubble (and there have been two others in the past 20+ years), we have seen many owners let their properties go back to their lenders (or in some cases to their associations) because they were not worth what they paid for them.  We are also seeing some owners that want to keep their homes, as they believe that they will eventually rise in value.</p>

<p>The “perfect storm” is the unprecedented sub-prime crisis coupled with a stock market collapse, accompanied by a significant increase in unemployment. Several commentators have reported that we would see different waves of foreclosures, and that is exactly what ALS has been experiencing.  Starting in September of 2008, ALS experienced the first wave of the “sub-prime” owner defaults, assessment delinquencies and resulting lender foreclosures.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.hoalawblog.com/2009/04/association_lien_services_has_1.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.hoalawblog.com/2009/04/association_lien_services_has_1.html</guid>
         <category>Assessment Collection</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 12:39:44 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>To Foreclose or Not to Foreclose; That Seems to be the Question</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Never in more than 20 years has ALS experienced a time when assessment collection has been as complicated and difficult as it is today.  Many boards of directors are unsure as to what to do when an owner is not paying their association or the senior lien holder/lender is not prepared to foreclose.  David Swedelson and Tracy Neal have prepared an article setting out the analysis that is required to assist boards in making what is truly a difficult decision. <strong><a href="http://www.hoalawblog.com/ToForecloseOrNot.pdf">Follow this link</a></strong> to read this article, and feel free to share this with your board of directors and/or other managers.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.hoalawblog.com/2009/04/to_foreclose_or_not_to_foreclo_1.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.hoalawblog.com/2009/04/to_foreclose_or_not_to_foreclo_1.html</guid>
         <category>Assessment Collection</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 15:07:02 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>HOA Members Reveal Their Biggest Fears (Regarding Unpaid Assessments)</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>This economic downturn and the significant increase in the number of delinquent homeowners are impacting all community associations. To be sure, some are facing more delinquencies than others.  But even the most affluent communities have homeowners that bought their homes at the height of the market with adjustable rate loans that they now cannot refinance, and they are losing their properties.  They are also not paying their assessments. </p>

<p>The website <strong><a href="http://www.hoaleader.com">HOALeader.com</a></strong> (created to provide support and information to board members and other HOA leaders) recently conducted a survey of HOA leaders on how they were dealing with the problem. Comments from HOA leaders regarding their fears and feelings of helplessness on how this is impacting their communities is interesting; they show that owners are concerned as to how their neighbors’ foreclosures are going to impact the amount of assessments they pay.  <strong><a href="http://www.hoalawblog.com/HOA%20Members%20Reveal%20Their%20Biggest%20Fears.pdf">Follow this link</a></strong> to read the article.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.hoalawblog.com/2009/04/hoa_members_reveal_their_bigge.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.hoalawblog.com/2009/04/hoa_members_reveal_their_bigge.html</guid>
         <category>Assessment Collection</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 15:03:18 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Stop Your Complaining//Nitpicking in Paradise?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><b><a href="http://www.hoalawblog.com/People%20Find%20Less%20to%20Complain%20About%20During%20Downturn%20-%20WSJ.com.pdf">Click here</a></b> to read an interesting article from the Wall Street Journal about complaining entitled "From Attitude to Gratitude." We all do it. And we know that homeowners at community associations like to complain a lot.  They complain about management. They complain about the board. Heck, sometimes they even complain about the association's legal counsel. They complain about the landscaping, the paint color, the temperature of the pool and the list goes on (and on and on). The attached article talks about owners complaining as "nitpicking in paradise."</p>

<p>Many of us complain we have so many calls or e-mails to deal with; we complain because there is so much work to do. Some board members complain about the homeowners, about all the delinquencies, about the high cost of insurance, etc., and the list goes on. </p>

<p>How about this: instead of complaining, why not say (or feel) how grateful  we are for what we have. If you are employed, stop complaining because 10% of Californians are out of work. If you still have some money in the bank or invested in stocks, stop complaining because some people invested their money in Ponzi schemes.</p>

<p>We all need to stop complaining and look at the bright side of things. Please read the article attached - it's humbling.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.hoalawblog.com/2009/03/stop_your_complainingnitpickin.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.hoalawblog.com/2009/03/stop_your_complainingnitpickin.html</guid>
         <category>Current Affairs</category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 17:07:33 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>SANDRA L. GOTTLIEB RECEIVES MAY RUSSELL HALL OF FAME AWARD</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>On Friday, February 27, 2009, the Orange County Chapter of Community Associations Institute (CAI) held its annual awards dinner.  We are pleased to announce that our very own Sandra Gottlieb was presented with the Chapter's coveted May Russell Hall of Fame Award.</p>

<p>Each year, the Orange County Chapter of CAI recognizes an outstanding individual who has been instrumental in the success of the Chapter.  The Chapter’s most prestigious award is named after May Russell, a former Irvine Company Executive who helped form CAI and was its first president (CAI started in Orange County).  Recipients of this Award were first announced in 1988 at the Chapter’s very first awards dinner.  The Award is presented to an individual who has proved exemplary leadership and demonstrated the ideals and objectives of CAI through active participation at the local, regional and/or national level.</p>

<p>Congratulations to Sandra Gottlieb!</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.hoalawblog.com/2009/03/sandra_l_gottlieb_receives_may.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.hoalawblog.com/2009/03/sandra_l_gottlieb_receives_may.html</guid>
         <category>Current Affairs</category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 17:02:18 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Condominium Association Duty of Care</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>The California Court of Appeal recently came down with a decision in the case of Ritter & Ritter Inc. v. The Churchill Condominium Association dealing with (among other things) the responsibilities and duty of care of a condominium association and its directors. We will address other issues relating to this case in a future article. </p>

<p>In this case, the homeowner requested that the association seal a hole in the slab which had been made as part of the original construction for pipes to pass-through from one unit to the other. There was no question that the hole should be filled in, as it constituted a fire danger. Somehow, the board incorrectly concluded that this hole was the homeowner’s responsibility to deal with, and the homeowner disagreed and sued the Association.  The work would have cost the association approximately $2,500 (for that unit); instead, the case cost the Association hundreds of thousands of dollars for attorneys' fees and costs. The Court of Appeals decision  (<a href="http://www.hoalawblog.com/Churchill%20adv%20Ritter.pdf" target="parent">click here</a>) provides an excellent discussion on a homeowner's versus the condominium association's repair responsibilities and the director's duty of care as well. The Court’s discussion on this issue follows:</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.hoalawblog.com/2009/02/condominium_association_duty_o.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.hoalawblog.com/2009/02/condominium_association_duty_o.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 12:34:50 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>COURT ORDERS HOMEOWNER TO LOWER HEIGHT OF HOME</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>When an association discovers that an owner has made substantial alterations or modifications to their home that were not approved (often after the work has been done and a neighbor complains), we often hear board members or community association managers suggest that a judge is not going to make the homeowner remove an extensive modification of a home just because that modification violates the Association’s Governing Documents. While that is certainly a consideration that a court must make, we received a report (in the Daily Journal legal newspaper) that one judge did the right thing and ruled in favor of the Association under these circumstances.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.hoalawblog.com/2009/01/court_orders_homeowner_to_lowe.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.hoalawblog.com/2009/01/court_orders_homeowner_to_lowe.html</guid>
         <category>CC&amp;R and Rule Enforcement</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 11:45:17 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>NEW LEGISLATION UPDATE (FOR NEW LAW THAT BECAME EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2009)</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>2008 was remarkable for the fact that the California Legislature did not pass much in the way of new legislation impacting or affecting California Community Associations. We are providing a summary of two changes to the California Civil Code regarding fines/assessments and solar energy that became effective as of January 1, 2009. </p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.hoalawblog.com/2009/01/new_legislation_update_for_new.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.hoalawblog.com/2009/01/new_legislation_update_for_new.html</guid>
         <category>Current Affairs</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 10:40:56 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>2008 U.S. Foreclosure Market Report - Foreclosure Activity Increases 81% in 2008</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>2008 was a banner year and for all of the wrong reasons. Foreclosure activity was way up, and the experts project that we will not see a decline in foreclosures in the near future.</p>

<p>RealtyTrac® (realtytrac.com), the leading online marketplace for foreclosure properties, released its 2008 U.S. Foreclosure Market Report™, which shows a total of 3,157,806 foreclosure filings — default notices, auction sale notices and bank repossessions — were reported on 2,330,483 U.S. properties during the year, an 81 percent increase in total properties from 2007 and a 225 percent increase in total properties from 2006. The report also shows that 1.84 percent of all U.S. housing units (one in 54) received at least one foreclosure filing during the year, up from 1.03 percent in 2007.<br />
 <br />
Foreclosure filings were reported on 303,410 U.S. properties in December, up 17 percent from the previous month and up nearly 41 percent from December 2007. Despite the spike in December, foreclosure activity for the fourth quarter was down nearly 4 percent from the previous quarter but still up nearly 40 percent from the fourth quarter of 2007.<br />
 <br />
Nevada is ranked #1 in foreclosure filings per household and California is now ranked #4 on a per household rate.</p>

<p>James J. Saccacio, chief executive officer of RealtyTrac, had the following to say regarding December foreclosure activity:  “State legislation that slowed down the onset of new foreclosure activity clearly had an effect on fourth quarter numbers overall, but that effect appears to have worn off by December.  The big jump in December foreclosure activity was somewhat surprising given the moratoria enacted by both Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, along with programs from some of the major lenders and loan servicers aimed at delaying foreclosure actions against distressed homeowners.  Clearly the foreclosure prevention programs implemented to-date have not had any real success in slowing down this foreclosure tsunami. And the recent California law, much like its predecessors in Massachusetts and Maryland, appears to have done little more than delay the inevitable foreclosure proceedings for thousands of homeowners.”</p>

<p>RealtyTrac believes the foreclosure numbers will go higher due to the 7% of loans that are now delinquent (per the Mortgage Bankers Association as of November) and due to the fact that more than half of the homeowners who received a loan modification in the first half of 2008 are already delinquent on their loans (per the U.S. Office of Thrift Supervision).  In addition to the above reasons, more than 500,000 jobs have been lost over November and December.     </p>

<p><a href="http://www.realtytrac.com/ContentManagement/pressrelease.aspx?ChannelID=9&ItemID=5681&accnt=64847">Click here</a> for more of the article and charts showing U.S. Foreclosure Market Data by state and to see how the top 100 Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) are fairing with foreclosures (for 2008).</p>

<p>This information means that California Community Associations should anticipate another year of delinquent owners abandoning their property with associations and the other members having to absorb this uncollectible bad debt.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.hoalawblog.com/2009/01/2008_us_foreclosure_market_rep.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.hoalawblog.com/2009/01/2008_us_foreclosure_market_rep.html</guid>
         <category>Assessment Collection</category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 14:15:08 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Pool Safety Subject of New Federal Law</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>On December 16th, we posted a <strong><a href="http://www.hoalawblog.com/2008/12/drain_rule_may_close_thousands.html"><u>blog entry</u></a></strong> regarding the new the Virginia Graeme Baker Pool and Spa Safety Act ("Act").  The Act is a federal law that took effect December 20, 2008.  It requires owners of “public” pools (the Act refers to spas as well) with submerged suction drains to retrofit the drains in order to limit and prevent drowning deaths caused by people becoming ensnared in a pool’s drain.<br />
 <br />
The Act defines “public” to include multi-family residential dwelling common areas and their (community) associations.</p>

<p>This new law has created a lot of controversy as many California community associations debate whether compliance is required or not, as this is a federal and not state law. Perhaps the real issues here are the potential risk of injury to children and others that use the pool or spa and potential exposure to the Association. As this new law impacts community associations, it is a big issue. It was the subject of a January 20, 2009 article in the <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123240579499995601.html"><u>Wall Street Journal</u></a>.  It has been reported that some boards of directors at community associations are delaying the appropriate retrofits because they believe that no one is really going to penalize their association for not taking the appropriate action. While it is true that no governmental authorities are (at least as of going to cite or penalize an association for not complying with the new law, and while it is likely that most associations' insurance carriers will defend and indemnify associations from injury claims, those insurance carriers will not indemnify the association or the individual board members if they are sued for intentional wrongdoing (knowing of the danger and the new law and intentionally deciding not to take action). As the Wall Street Journal article points out (quoting an official with State Farm insurance): (community associations that keep their pools open and do not retrofit) "will probably have a more difficult time proving they are not liable."</p>

<p>Our advice: retrofit as soon as possible and in the meantime, either close (empty?) the pool. It may be appropriate to post notices and disclose the issue and potential danger to the owners and residents. And just so we are clear,  posting notices and disclosing the situation may not necessarily insulate the board or the association for potential liability if the pool remains open. Be careful out there!</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.hoalawblog.com/2009/01/pool_safety_subject_of_new_fed.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.hoalawblog.com/2009/01/pool_safety_subject_of_new_fed.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 15:30:52 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>SANDRA GOTTLIEB AWARDED SPEAKER OF THE YEAR</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>SANDRA GOTTLIEB AWARDED SPEAKER OF THE YEAR<br />
BY THE SACRAMENTO CHAPTER OF COMMUNITY ASSOCIATIONS INSTITUTE</p>

<p>On December 4, 2008, Sandra Gottlieb (and other members of her panel) was awarded the coveted Speaker of the Year Honors by the Sacramento Chapter of Community Associations Institute (CAI) for her role in a panel program “Managing Foreclosures”.</p>

<p>This is what the Sacramento Chapter had to say about Sandra Gottlieb (the panel) and this award:</p>

<p>With over 105 in attendance, the Managing Foreclosures luncheon drew the largest attendance of the year.  Thank you to Sandra, Susan (Oliver) and Rolf (Crocker) for your dedication to the continued education for this Chapter.</p>

<p>They went on to say the following regarding Sandra Gottlieb:</p>

<p>Sandra is truly a dynamic speaker.  Sandra, as well as the panel, turned a difficult subject into a valuable and informative seminar.  Her knowledge and expertise in the industry is without measure.  Her insight, experience and personality reflect her dedication to CAI and the HOA industry.  Sandra really knows what it takes to survive in this ever-changing industry.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.hoalawblog.com/2008/12/sandra_gottlieb_awarded_speake.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.hoalawblog.com/2008/12/sandra_gottlieb_awarded_speake.html</guid>
         <category>Current Affairs</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 15:23:45 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>
